We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
Wednesday, 03 November 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
November is here and soon the all time seasonal favorite “all I want or Christmas is you” by Mariah Carey will be played in radio stati ...
Monday, 01 November 21
COAL PRICES HAVE FURTHER ROOM TO DROP: TOP ECONOMIC PLANNER - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s top economic planner said coal prices have further room to drop on Friday, as the most traded coal futures dropped to below 1,000 yua ...
Saturday, 30 October 21
CHINA'S COAL PRICES SEE BIGGEST WEEKLY FALL IN MORE THAN 5 YEARS - REUTERS
China’s coal futures prices saw their biggest fall in more than five years after the powerful state planner said there is still room to adjus ...
Saturday, 30 October 21
G-20 LEADERS PREPARE STATEMENT TO STOP FUNDING FOREIGN COAL PLANTS - BLOOMBERG
Leaders of the Group of 20 wealthy economies are preparing to pledge to stop funding foreign coal-fired plants, but are still wrangling over climat ...
Friday, 29 October 21
APAC THERMAL COAL SUPPLY TO REMAIN TIGHT AS WINTER LOOMS - FITCH RATINGS
APAC thermal coal prices have surged, hitting historically high levels. The benchmark Newcastle 6,000kcal/kg grade coal reached USD228/tonne in mid ...
|
|
Showing 401 to 405 news of total 6846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
|
|
|
|